NAS Consensus on Human Genome Editing: The World Reacts
Yesterday saw the release of the National Academy of Sciences consensus report on human genome editing, which explored many of the issues surround the science and ethics of manipulating human genes. The Academy’s report cautiously welcomed the prospect of human germ line editing, but only if there were clear health benefits and that stringent regulations were adhered to. Here we round up the global media reaction to the report!
Human genome editing shouldn’t be used for enhancement – yet (New Scientist)
Genome-edited humans get green light from expert panel (Ars Technica)
Review favours human gene editing under stringent conditions (Financial Times)
Germline gene editing should be allowed – in certain cases (BioWorld Online)
Human Gene Editing Receives Science Panel’s Support (New York Times)
Ethicists advise caution in applying CRISPR gene editing to humans (Washington Post)
Spotted an article that we’ve missed? Let us know in the comments below.