Novo Mutations Can be Important in Autism
A new study of the genetic factors involved in the causation of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) draws fresh attention to the impact these illnesses have on motor skills, and more broadly on cognitive function.
Careful inference from the data published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests to researchers that the genetic factors causing ASD broadly diminish the brain’s cognitive functions.
“Diminished motor skills appear to be an almost universal property of children with autism,” says Professor Michael Wigler, one of three researchers including Ivan Iossifov from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) and the New York Genome Center, and Andreas Buja, a statistician from The University of Pennsylvania, who led the team.
Wigler adds that careful inference from the data suggests to him that the genetic factors causing ASD broadly diminish the brain’s cognitive functions.
These genetic factors are increasingly becoming known, and are of two types: inherited mutations, and what scientists call de novo mutations. The latter are changes to the DNA that do not appear in the genetic makeup of either parent and are new in the child. Past research at CSHL and elsewhere has revealed that the presence of damaging de novo mutations correlates with lower non-verbal IQ. The more severe the mutations, the more pronounced the impact.
The new study finds that diminished motor skills, like lower IQ, also correlate significantly with de novo mutations in ASD, and is an even more sensitive indicator of the damage of a de novo mutation than is IQ, say the researchers.
Interestingly, the researchers find that the defining core behavioural components of ASD — impaired social skills and communication — do not correlate with either the presence or severity of de novo mutations. In other words, a child with autism who has a severe de novo mutation is no more likely to have severely impaired social skills than a child with autism for whom no such mutation was found, and who presumably has inherited his causal factors.
Restating, the researchers now think that children who have autism as a consequence of inherited factors have less general cognitive damage than those with severe de novo mutations, which, says Wigler, in puzzling on the face of it.
One speculation from Wigler is that mutations with very damaging impact on cognition will tend to be eliminated rapidly from the gene pool, as people with them are less likely to have children. Thus inherited factors will have low cognitive impact relative to their general behavioural impact. By contrast, de novo mutations have no such constraint. Thus individuals on the spectrum as a result of inherited factors will tend to have less impairment of IQ and motor skills relative to their core behavioural components than individuals who have severe de novo mutations.
Nonetheless, the near universality of diminished motor skills in children with autism is an indicator that the factors that cause the core behavioural defects also cause general cognitive dysfunction, Professor Wigler explains. “As such, objective assessment of cognitive function should be a facet of any clinical evaluation of the patient,” he says. “and included when monitoring therapeutic response.”
This study was based on DNA sequence and deep phenotypic data from the Simons Simplex Collection, a set of 2,760 families that have a single child affected by ASD.
Materials provided by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.